Autologous versus allogeneic business model

by Alexey Bersenev on March 1, 2013 · 1 comment

in RegenMed digest

Post to Twitter Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn

There are two major business models in cell therapy and regenerative medicine industry – autologous and allogeneic. Each model has pros and cons. I’d briefly summarize features of each model as the following:

Autologous:

  • personalized/ highly customized therapy
  • medical procedure-like;
  • scale out manufacturing;
  • very high manufacturing cost (cost of goods (COGs), series of quality control assays for each patient = 1 batch, labor);
  • complicated regulatory path;
  • complicated logistics;
  • low-to-no risk of immunogenicity;
  • hard to commercialize and standardize;
  • possible slow adoption in clinic.

Allogeneic:

  • not personalized (one similar product for many)
  • traditional Pharma/ Biotech-like – “off-the-shelf”;
  • clear logistics;
  • scale up manufacturing;
  • lower cost of manufacturing (low COGs, one series of quality control assays per batch);
  • clear and easier regulatory path;
  • highly dependent from donor raw material availability;
  • cell banks-based (master/ working/ clinical cell banks);
  • risks associated with allogeneic cells (more tests for donor raw materials, immunogenicity);
  • easier to commercialize;
  • requires larger storage facility and shipment department;
  • potentially easy adoption in clinic.

Considerably, allo- model is more pro-industry and more suitable for successful commercialization. Some professionals don’t even believe that auto- models could be successfully commercialized and adopted on the medical market. Nevertheless, we can see multiple companies in the field, which pursue either allo- or auto- business models.

I was curious to look at clinical trials data for the last couple of years. The graph below represents the number of industry-sponsored cell therapy clinical trials, registered in 2011 and 2012:

industry_donor_type

I’ve found that, despite general assumption, cell therapy industry companies pretty much equally develop auto- and allo- therapies. Even though, clinical development stage doesn’t yet mean market approval, clinical adoption and successful commercialization, it could indicate to the real interest of cell product business developers.

**********************
RegenMed Digest on Stem Cell Assays is sponsored by Regenerative Medicine Jobs. Please visit Regenerative Medicine Jobs for recent position openings.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Marie March 4, 2013 at 10:25 am

Thanks you for quantifying this Alexey!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: